Just when you think Rush can't get any nuttier -- he manages to.

Some folks just do not "unnerstan" when Rush has his tongue-in-his-cheek. A good depictuion of some Obama followers & supporters - otherwise pure BS. And I do not care for Obama as President.

Oh my gosh, I won't be able to take Obama past 2012 let alone 2016. Yikes.

Luv ya Rush. Very funny, but realistic bit. It could happen.

Rush complaining about someone else's "cult-like followers"? Whatever.
The best thing that could happen to Limbaugh is a 3rd Obama term.

Limbaugh talks about Obama siding with the guy who's trying to rip up the Honduran Constitution. Doesn't he realize that the Constitution of Honduras does not make any room for a military coup? If the President of Honduras was trying to rip the Consitution to threads, then he should have been removed in a lawful manner according to the Constitution.

I guess that this plain and simple fact hasn't dawned on Rush Limbaugh shouldn't be a surprise. Obama stands up for the rule of law, and this moron gets incensed! Figures.

Here's a good article on the topic:

[experts.foreignpolicy.com]

doesn't Obama's "cult"include the majority of voters in the USA ?.

This is to folks like Carolynn and the dangerously misinformed Gabrielle: pull your heads out. Please.

First of all, the same legislator tried this bill 3 times while Bush was in office. And more importantly, even if this did go into effect (which it won't), it cannot apply to the sitting president.

I mean, do you people even bother to learn the first thing about news items you prattle on about? Do you?

Let's be real for one second... if you listen to Rush Limbaugh for anything more than a sad cackle at what a double standard buffoon he is, then you are just painfully ignorant to life on this planet. Frankly, his listeners are so willfully, painfully and proudly full-blown stupid that I'm amazed they have managed to stay alive this long.

If anyone says Mr. L has his tongue in his cheek here, they are tone-deaf. This is said too seriously to understand anything as "tongue-in-cheek".
Now, looking at the argument, I will not go back and show how Bush and Cheney bent the constitution to their purposes. I just find it interesting that conservatives talk themselves out of being a minority by stating that the Obama followers are "a bunch of minorities" following their leader in a "cult like" way.
1st: how do you form a majority? Find a way to please as many people as possible. The bunch of minorities behind Obama makes up around 60% of Americans. This is one majority. The 25% who are against him are one minority - even if you certainly could split them up into Anti-State extremists, religious extremists, just plain conservatives and cult-like followers of Rush L. Perhaps there would be some more groups but this way you have already split the 25% into four groups. I view them as one opposing minority.
People who take Limbaugh and Fox seriously are, it seems, all too ready to twist anything they hear into something they think is right. And, of course they like to hear things that scare them, like Obama is a dictator.
I have yet to hear of anything that would even have me think that the suspicion is in any way justified!

I read the article that you are speaking about the other day and she was 100% right about Obama's direction! I sent this article everywhere I could think of.

But I would like as may people to read this other article that I found on Fox this morning:

[directorblue.blogspot.com]

This government is crazy, Mad and we need to do something!!!

Rush thinks Hussien O wants to clear the way for a third term. My God if this man is elected for a second term, I will jump off a bridge. Of course he will have destroyed the country so much by 2012 I won't want to live here any longer anyway. He reminds me of Michael Jackson - a replusive man with a cult following.

Frankly, I think Rush is being too conservative in his prophecy here. In 1996, Clinton sought and received legal advice assuring him that as Commander in Chief, he could delegate to the UN authority over the military (go ahead, Google UN military authority).

Think our nation is too big for a coup? Imagine this scenario: O & Co. declare marshall law, cancel the 2012 elections, and order troops into U.S. cities to quell any dissent/riots/uprisings. Of course, members of the military who refuse such orders will be arrested and UN troops (yeah, from those Euro and Asian nations that would love to see us under fascist rule) will take their place. How many Americans are willing to lay their lives on the line as their ancestors did in 1775? We've become a nation of self-preservationists.

But back to reality... O & Co. are trying to shove every whacko bill through now because in reality, they only have until the end of 2009. In 2010, too many legislators are going to be worrying about their jobs (aka getting re-elected) to fall in step with unpopular and disastrous ideas. Unfortunately, they can do a helluva lot of damage in 11 months time.

Leave Rush alone.
We Liberals love his 'logic'!

Why was the last sentence of Rush's dialogue omitted from the video?

Snowhare, you are absolutely wrong.

About 23% of Americans (assuming the census is correct at 300 million) voted for BO. The rest either voted for McCain, another candidate from a minor party, or stayed home. Not exactly the sweeping mandate BO and his MSM cronies would have you believe they have now is it.

Only 23%, and that includes the dead people and other fraudulent votes ACORN drummed up, with a President as "unpopular" as Bush was and the vote was still not a landslide victory. You'll notice that most of the terrible legislation like Cap and Tax doesn't take place until 2012, after BO has gained re-election momentum. Rush may or may not be correct, but viewing BO's narcissistic tendencies I'd lean slightly towards him being correct, though I hope he's very wrong.

Actually Obama did not stand up for law, he stood up for a man who attempted to break the law by defying the Supreme Court and the Honduran legislature in attempting to re-write the Honduran Constitution. I've read that he military acted at the behest of the legislature, which in Honduras it answers to both the President and the Legislature. That's about as much as I know of Honduran law, are you an expert in Honduran law?

@A Different Scott -

You realize that you're including two-year-olds in that 23% stat, right?

Thank you, Lone Patriot ! That is very helpful information !