Top Videos

What's Up Hillary's Sleeve?

RCP Comment Policies
By Dick Morris and Eileen McGann
Why won't Hillary just concede that she has lost and pull out of the race? Why does she persist in keeping her delegates in line for her and not releasing them to Obama? Why does she feign party unity while, in fact, undermining it?

The Clintons never do anything without a lot of thinking and planning. There is no benign explanation for her maneuvers. They have several options that they are deliberately keeping open by their increasingly awkward positioning. Here's what they're up to:

1. The Obama Stumbles Option

As Hillary says, June is "early" in politics when the convention is not to be held until the end of August, unusually late for a Democratic conclave. And, as Tip O'Neill says "a week is a long time in politics." So is three months. (Read Full Article)

(Click Here to Comment on All RCP Articles)

Join the Discussion

165 Comments | Post Comment

Posted by: HOPE&CHANGE  
Jun 10, 11:41 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

FizzyFizzyBee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> My comment has to do with the comments, not the
> story...
>
> Once again I can't stop thinking about why some of
> Senator Clinton's supporters are so vehemently
> against voting for Senator Obama in the fall. Did
> he commit some kind of crime against these people?
> He did not. All he did was win. And since when is
> it so utterly despicable to win a contest fairly,
> squarely, and with great amounts of support and
> goodwill, in this country? The more likely answer
> seems to be far more insidious: these folks are,
> sadly, not ready for a person of color to lead our
> nation, but even worse, they're masking that
> sentiment with an attitude that cryptically
> indicates that Mr. Obama has wronged them somehow
> by winning the nomination.
>
> Supporters of Mrs. Clinton who say "I will NOT
> vote for Barack Obama," ask yourselves why.
> Really, why? It's hard to believe that this
> hardline stance is about policy or the issues;
> Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama are nearly identical
> there (except that HRC supported the war in Iraq
> and Obama did not). So unless your reason is that
> you're for the war in Iraq and he didn't support
> it, or you are fully versed on the minor
> differences in the two candidates' healthcare
> plans, dig deep and be honest with yourself. And
> if you find even the slightest hint of fear or
> bias or prejudice against people who are different
> from you, let some light in.


You are absolutely right, Fizzy! If, indeed, there are democrats who supported HRC in the primaries and are now saying they WILL NOT vote for Obama, then your question to them is spot on: "Supporters of Mrs. Clinton who say "I will NOT
> vote for Barack Obama," ask yourselves why.
> Really, why? It's hard to believe that this
> hardline stance is about policy or the issues;
> Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama are nearly identical
> there. dig deep and be honest with yourself. And
> if you find even the slightest hint of fear or
> bias or prejudice against people who are different
> from you, let some light in."

This is an excellent point to be made over and over.

On the other hand, another very likely explanation is that, its NOT HRC supporters who are saying that they will NOT vote for Obama, but rather RETHUGLICANS in their 'Operation Chaos' strategy. These rethugs are infiltrating Dem blogs and other places online and spreading this FALSEhood that HRC supporters are threatening to vote McBUSHSHAME in the GE - nothing more, nothing less.

Dont be fooled by these RETHUGS.

Posted by: azgregg44  
Jun 09, 01:39 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

caryn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To those of you that feel Hillary was disrespected
> by the Obama campaign, look at the list of issues
> he could have brought up and didn't. The GOP
> would have loved running against her.
> 1. Juanita Broderick
> 2. Hugh Rodham
> 3. Impeachment
> 4. Sandy Berger
> 5. 30% decline in governorships while Clinton was
> in office
> 6. Lost control in Congress during the Clinton
> years
> 7. Frank Guistra
> 8. Rose Law Firm
> 9. Somalia
> 10. Webb Hubbell
> 11. Doug Coe
> 12. Bill Clintons foreign business dealings
> 13. Tyson chicken
> 14. Norman Hsu
> 15. Peter Paul
> 16. Whitewater
> 17. Mark Rich
> 18. Vince Foster
> 19. The millons of dollars in speaking fees Bill
> Clinton earned from Saudi Arabia
> 20. Donors to the Clinton Foundation
> 21. Donors to the Clinton Library
> 22. Monica Lewinsky
> 23. Gennifer Flowers
> 24. Kathleen Willey
> 25. Susan Coleman
> 26. Voting for the Iraq War!!!!
>
> Hillary and in general the Clintons could have
> been dragged in the mud. Obama did not touch any
> of these isssues. Had the shoe been on the other
> foot, you know Hillary and Bill would have been
> attacking Obama 24/7.
>
> Obama played by the rules. Hillary signed the
> DNC's agreement concerning Michigan and Florida
> and insisted on changing the rules when it was
> obvious she needed their support to have a chance.
>
>
> The Obama campaign has taken anything and
> everything that both the Clintons and the GOP have
> thrown at him and held his own fairly well. The
> Obama campaign has treated the Clintons with kid
> gloves. OBAMA '08


the problem with your list is 74 % are just plain lies. The rest everyone knows about. If obummer tried to say anything, he would come across too bitter.

azgregg

Posted by: fundamentals  
Jun 08, 07:27 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

eebaltimore #160 wrote:

Most of the stuff detractors have said about the Clintons have originated with the right-wing Republican smear machine, which plagued the Clintons
--------------

Oh, yes. What was some of the things the "rightwing hate machine" is accused of saying?

Bros before hos... 99 problems but a what isn't one of them?
Bbbbbrrrraaaaaddllleey eefffeeeccct!

Tears?! No tears for hurricane victims!

....militaristic! no self-respecting feminist should vote for a woman who supports war!
Bush in a dress!!! she's a race-baiter!
warmonger! Mamie Eisenhower ./ travel agent!
corporate @#$%&!
you can't trust, she's a liar and a cheat!

EE, that shilling stuff didn't come from the right wing hate machine, they couldn't get a word in edge wise. It came out of mainstream left wing pundits and propagandists. From Billionaire David Geffen, Zbig Brzezinski, Olbermann, John Nichols, Prof Zunes, Dowd, Huffington, Hayden, MoJo's David Corn. To name just a few.


.

Moralists and patronizing elitists. the right wing loved watching them attack Hillary Clinton and anyone who got in their way. These elitists always talk about "how they put up with the Clintons during Bill's presidency, but not anymore --they've had enough"....

Self-serving blowhards. If the party loses the general election, it is because of these insufferable boors, not because of bitter, clinging small town "rubes" who just "don't get it".

Posted by: sheldan  
Jun 08, 05:11 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

What makes you think that Hillary will be a viable candidate in 2012? We already know about her from her husband's presidency, and what we see we really don't like. I think that by 2012 or 2016, Hillary will be less popular than she is now. Maybe the best thing the Clintons can do is to go back to being public servants and not try to make a comeback.

Posted by: Ofelia  
Jun 08, 02:40 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

Take a break Dick. All the warts that are written by the likes of you haven't reduced my respect for the Clintons one bit. You know as well as I do that all politicians have warts, no exception. You and Maureen Dowd should take up another subject to earn your money. You both are obsessing about the Clintons, it's pathetic. Meanwhile, the rest of the world has moved on.

Posted by: eebaltimore  
Jun 08, 02:05 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

Sue Mieh Wrote:

Doing so will help you to realize that we are all one
> people in this world, connected by humanity and
> the basic needs for love and survival.
>
> In the words of Bob Marley:
>
> "One love, one heart
> Let's get together and feel all right
> Hear the children crying (One love)
> Hear the children crying (One heart)
> Sayin', "Give thanks and praise to the Lord and I
> will feel all right."
> Sayin', "Let's get together and feel all right."
_________________________________

Sue Mieh, why don't you run on over to Trinity Church in Chicago, take to the pulpit, and sing this Marley song loud & clear to the hate-filled, white-hating congregants there?

To you and all Obama-bots, all I can say is:

"Let there be peace on earth,
and let it begin with me..."

EVERYBODY: please, stop bashing Hillary. You are all only hardening the resolve of her supporters to NOT support Obama!

Most of the stuff detractors have said about the Clintons have originated with the right-wing Republican smear machine, which plagued the Clintons all during their administration. Read Hillary's book: "Living History." All of the awful things of which they've been accused are just plain LIES. There is NO TRUTH to any of this stuff. They have never been convicted of ANYTHING. Report after report came out saying there was no wrong doing, after nearly $10 million spent by Ken Starr & others to drag them through the mud. It is just plain immoral to falsely accuse people of things. "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor." Words to live by...

And, Dick Morris, why don't you fold up your slime machine & go back under that ugly, black rock you live under?

Posted by: michaelp0429  
Jun 08, 09:35 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

Every single candidate who has 'dropped out of the race' has merely suspended their campaign. ALL OF THEM.

They all keep their delegates. They all keep the option to raise more money. They all want a vote on the platform of the party at the convention. Indeed it is their responsibility to do so as representatives of the people who voted for them.

Edwards will do so. Richardson will do so. Clinton will do so.

You people who spend so much time hating the Clintons because they dared to run against your candidate prove again and again that you are no more about unity and a new tone in politics than Hitler was.

Posted by: michaelp0429  
Jun 08, 09:23 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

First, she won by more than 22 pts, so even if there was a poll citing 22% of people voting against him because he was black, that still wouldn't have made up the difference.

Second, there was no poll that said that 22% of the voters voted based on race.

Third, of the ones who said race was a factor, a significant chunk, both white and black voted FOR Obama. Race is a factor for me - it gives Obama bonus points in my book because like MOST American's I would love to see our first Black President, (even if I think Obama is not qualified to be that man).

Fourth, in every single primary exit poll, MORE democrats said the nation was ready for a Black President than a female President. Of course there are some idiots who won't vote for a black man but there are MORE that won't vote for a woman. Every single poll said the same thing. So whatever discrimination there was against Obama, it was probably outweighed by discrimination against her.

Sorry the black population wasn't large enough to cary the state for him with their understandable but mindless passion for him, (to be clear I do not assert that black people are mindless in general, just that thier passion for Obama is rooted in their pride at seeing a black man who can win for the first time, not any of his policies, experience or actual message), but don't blame racism for his defeats.


poppycock Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> JWilson post 112 wrote:
>
> Yes.. because lord knows when polls show that 22%
> of voters based on race, and with the Bradley
> effect consideration - racism, in fact, WAS the
> point of difference.
> ----------------------------------
>
> Wilson, 24% of the black vote that voted for
> Obama in NC said race was a factor.

Posted by: michaelp0429  
Jun 08, 09:09 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

Bill Clinton did not give us "terrorism full scale".

Mulsim terrorism goes back to the Olympics decades before Clinton took office. Ronald Reagan did more to promote terrorism than any president before George W Bush by saying publicly that we do not negotiate with terrorists - a good plan - and then actually negotiating with them, and worse - rewarding them, in the arms for hostages deal. He turned his back and ran after the Beruit bombings, hoping it would all go away.

Bill Clinton never did anything to cause the rise of Terrorism, in fact he tried hard to fight Bin Ladin, but your Republicans fought him when he did because you were afraid a war against terrorism as started by Clinton bombing Al Qaida training camps - who knew how prophetic he was? - would distract the nation from YOUR cause of impeaching the President of the U.S. for having sex.

George W Bush has pushed world terrorism to new heights by first ignoring everything the Clinton administration gave him on Al Qaida, then ignoring his own team's warnings about a pending attack (which turned out to be 911) then by invading one country and not finishing the job because he had an erection for invading another sovereign nation that had never done anything to attack us. Because of George W Bush terrorism in the world has spread and grown as reasonable muslims see the U.S. as an occupying power - something that was not true before George W Bush.

Most of what you say about Obama is accurate but stop trying to blame every problem in the world on Democrats, you are over-reaching.


Gene44 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In politics it is like a football game in that it
> is not over under the final whistle. That final
> whistle comes at the end of the convention when
> the Head of the DNC states this is our candidate
> for becoming President. Hillary knows this full
> well. As I have read all the international papers
> it appears that the entire world wants Obama to be
> the next President regardless of what Americans
> want. However, to the other side of that equation
> is that the Western world governments are
> extremely cautious about having Obama as the next
> President. Remember that Kennedy gave us the
> Berlin Wall in Germany, the Cuban nuclear missile
> crisis and then Vietnam. President Clinton then
> gave us terrorism full scale and refused to stand
> up to it. The Democrat Party has been trying for
> ages to get an elite elected as President as it
> fits their notions of a rosey peaceful world.
> They will never learn that evil does exist on this
> planet and it has to be stood up too or else.
> Obama has already stated many things in his
> speaches which I fear the people did not take to
> heart about his change - get use to doing with
> less, no SUV's as we have to worry about the world
> not just Americans. Taxes have to be raised for
> the larger government, more government control
> over everything. Capitalism does not equate with
> the Marxist and Socialism world and American must
> accept these changes. In his speach to the
> graduating class when he filled in for Kennedy he
> makeit clear that capitalism does not work as the
> graduates should be looking to serve the
> government and help poorer countries. Clinton
> knows also that things can happen overnight in
> politics and she is smart to suspend her campaign.
> Who knows what dirt will wash out to hit the
> press in the next couple of months. The DNC has
> already put a noose around Michelle Obama where
> she can only use prewritten speaches and take no
> questions. They are afraid that her racist views
> will be out in the open.

Posted by: michaelp0429  
Jun 08, 08:56 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

Sharpton Keepin it Real Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sylvia Jackson wrote:
>
> "Obama behaved badly in this campaign, he
> disrespected Hillary"
>
> Save it Sylvia Jackson, we know you are a
> Republican troll trying to spread discord, no one
> believes that Barack mistreated Hillary during the
> campaign, if anything he treated her with kid
> gloves, knowing that as a relatively young Black
> man or a man period - he could not be seen
> mistreating the elderly ex-first lady - so save
> that crap.

One more flat out LIE from an Obama supporter. You can argue that he didn't treat her unfairly - though you would be wrong it is a judgement call - but you can not claim any credibility whatsoever when you choose to assert that "no one believes that barack mistreated Hillary". Millions of us do. Millions of us former Democrats do.

And calling anyone who disagrees with you a 'troll' is just one more example of the ugliness coming from Obama supporters. That you guys claim to like his message of hope and unity while calling anyone who disagrees with you any name you can think of is scary - it's certain proof to me that you guys aren't about unity or hope at all.

Posted by: a11  
Jun 08, 08:48 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

I hope the Clinton's "secret police" are good. It may be our only way to win in November.

Posted by: Get Real  
Jun 08, 08:41 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

Molly Pitcher Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trust me, Sharpton. There will be no federal ban
> on abortion. Murder is (for lack of a better
> word) regulated by the states. The most that
> Congress could do (and very unlikely at that)
> would be to deny federal funds to agencies
> performing them.

There has never been a federal law PERMITTING abortion, either. It was a decision made by the SCOTUS. That was a mistake. It should be up to the states.

Posted by: Jan  
Jun 08, 08:27 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

The only way the Democrats will come together is if both of these Democrats are on the ticket. Otherwise, as a Clinton supporter, I would feel like Al Gore voting for GWB. In other words, I'm not gonna be voting for BHO.

Posted by: Greengrace  
Jun 08, 08:18 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

Hillary should not completely concede because she's being PUSHED out by a bunch of top Dem men. That's b.s....and she, and her supporters know it! Her speech was not the real Hillary! [www.hellnobama.com]

Posted by: energydem  
Jun 08, 07:47 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

Sharpton Keepin it Real Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sylvia Jackson wro
>
> "Obama behaved badly in this campaign, he
> disrespected Hillary"
>
> Save it Sylvia Jackson, we know you are a
> Republican troll trying to spread discord, no one
> believes that Barack mistreated Hillary during the
> campaign, if anything he treated her with kid
> gloves, knowing that as a relatively young Black
> man or a man period - he could not be seen
> mistreating the elderly ex-first lady - so save
> that crap.

He didn't treat her badly, his campaign treated her badly. If you believe his surrogates and campaign staff weren't whispering to their sycophantic friends in the media all the time, I have a bridge to sell you. Obama could have shut this down and he did nothing.

What's shocking is how easy it was to brand two people as racists who have spent 40 years in the trenches working to improve the world for African Americans and all others who are disadvantaged in our system. The Obama campaign did so through a complicit media, a far left wing that is mired in the world of political correctness, and a memo from the campaign that provided the roadmap for doing so.

Further his surrogates were allowed, once again by a complicit media, to make sexist comments across the country. One need look no further than Zbigniew Brzezinski, a key advisor to the Obama campaign. His interview (by his daughter no less) in which he discounted Hillary's experience as first lady and likened it to Mamie Eisenhower's in a very denigrating way, belies all the great strides made by women since the 1950s, led by women like Hillary Clinton. No one in the media said a word. Howard Dean reportedly paled when he was recently shown a video stringing together all the sexist things said by the media and Obama surrogates -- it should be shown to all Democrats who think Bill and Hillary are racists and the Obama campaign was not sexist.

Obama has alot of work to do to win over her supporters and he better start asking. In my view, the VP slot is all that will do it -- otherwise there will be massive defections to McCain What people don't understand is that independents like McCain, white men in swing states like McCain, Latinos like McCain.

I am a hard core Democrat, Hillary supporter and I will vote for Obama. Alot of others who are not so committed to the Democratic party, will not.

Posted by: Gene44  
Jun 08, 06:51 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

In politics it is like a football game in that it is not over under the final whistle. That final whistle comes at the end of the convention when the Head of the DNC states this is our candidate for becoming President. Hillary knows this full well. As I have read all the international papers it appears that the entire world wants Obama to be the next President regardless of what Americans want. However, to the other side of that equation is that the Western world governments are extremely cautious about having Obama as the next President. Remember that Kennedy gave us the Berlin Wall in Germany, the Cuban nuclear missile crisis and then Vietnam. President Clinton then gave us terrorism full scale and refused to stand up to it. The Democrat Party has been trying for ages to get an elite elected as President as it fits their notions of a rosey peaceful world. They will never learn that evil does exist on this planet and it has to be stood up too or else.
Obama has already stated many things in his speaches which I fear the people did not take to heart about his change - get use to doing with less, no SUV's as we have to worry about the world not just Americans. Taxes have to be raised for the larger government, more government control over everything. Capitalism does not equate with the Marxist and Socialism world and American must accept these changes. In his speach to the graduating class when he filled in for Kennedy he makeit clear that capitalism does not work as the graduates should be looking to serve the government and help poorer countries. Clinton knows also that things can happen overnight in politics and she is smart to suspend her campaign. Who knows what dirt will wash out to hit the press in the next couple of months. The DNC has already put a noose around Michelle Obama where she can only use prewritten speaches and take no questions. They are afraid that her racist views will be out in the open.

Posted by: sigh  
Jun 08, 06:02 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

Lol at strawman arguments. Yes, clearly because some Obama supporters are riduculous means all of them are!!! It's not like any other candidates have overly enthusiastic supporters!!!

Anyway, why does it matter if Clinton doesn't officially end her campain? At this point she isn't campaigning negatively against Obama, which was the only real problem that ever came up with her staying in the race.


Independent observer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is it just me or are Obama supporters always angry
> and vicious? All I get from this story is that
> Clinton is a damn good POLITICIAN. Nothing more,
> nothing less. Good politicians keep their options
> open. To expect Clinton to concede when it was so
> close is, for lack of a better word, naive. Obamas
> supporters remind me of school kids. Win,lose or
> draw one thing is certain every time.. they are
> poor winners, poor losers and very naively they
> just don't believe in a draw.
>
> Order Of The Obama Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ding dong, the Wicked Witch of the West Wing is
> > dead. Barack has liquidated her.
> >
> > But as I have predicted for weeks, Hillary has
> > only "suspended" her campaign so her delegates
> are
> > not released and she can still get the
> nomination
> > if some "mishap" befalls Obama like an
> "accident"
> > or a "sudden illness." Watch your back, Obama.
> >
> > Dick makes an error when he says she'd be
> content
> > to be Obaam's VP for two full terms and then
> run
> > herself in 2016. She'd be 68 years old then
> and
> > plastic surgery could not make her viable --
> look
> > how hard it is for a man that old to win.
> >
> > So if she became VP, Hillary would have to
> count
> > on Barack's dying in office like 7 previous
> > Presidents. Michelle knows what that means
> for
> > her husband's life expectancy and she will
> never
> > let Barack put the malevolent, pantsuited liar
> on
> > the ticket.

Posted by: Independent observer  
Jun 08, 04:58 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

Is it just me or are Obama supporters always angry and vicious? All I get from this story is that Clinton is a damn good POLITICIAN. Nothing more, nothing less. Good politicians keep their options open. To expect Clinton to concede when it was so close is, for lack of a better word, naive. Obamas supporters remind me of school kids. Win,lose or draw one thing is certain every time.. they are poor winners, poor losers and very naively they just don't believe in a draw.

Order Of The Obama Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ding dong, the Wicked Witch of the West Wing is
> dead. Barack has liquidated her.
>
> But as I have predicted for weeks, Hillary has
> only "suspended" her campaign so her delegates are
> not released and she can still get the nomination
> if some "mishap" befalls Obama like an "accident"
> or a "sudden illness." Watch your back, Obama.
>
> Dick makes an error when he says she'd be content
> to be Obaam's VP for two full terms and then run
> herself in 2016. She'd be 68 years old then and
> plastic surgery could not make her viable -- look
> how hard it is for a man that old to win.
>
> So if she became VP, Hillary would have to count
> on Barack's dying in office like 7 previous
> Presidents. Michelle knows what that means for
> her husband's life expectancy and she will never
> let Barack put the malevolent, pantsuited liar on
> the ticket.

Posted by: nicol  
Jun 08, 03:29 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

For # 49 comment.
BHO is charismatic? LOL. Tastes really differ. Need anti-emetic each time I see his ugly face. He does look like "curious George". And that's what you call charismatic.. ROTFLMAO.
I bet terrorists all over the world find him very charismatic also. BY the way he's wife is a real beauty too. Great couple, aren't they? And they both think that USA is a mean country.

Posted by: John4Hillary  
Jun 08, 03:26 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

Dick Morris is a vile piece of trash.

Posted by: Thomas Abrams  
Jun 08, 03:25 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

As an Obama supporter I find Dick Morris predictable. I expected that once Obama won Mr. Morris would turn his Fox News bias against Obama. What fun, now he can continue to hate Senator Clinton and also attack Obama daily. I have not seen a critical piece on McCAIN lately. I THINK PREDICTABILTY IS A POOR TRAIT FOR A JOURNALIST AND THAT IS NOW MR MORRIS' TRADEMARK. It nust be an empty fealing to simply manipulate for a living rather than come out with candid opinions.

Posted by: Spidey  
Jun 08, 03:13 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

You have to laugh at the way the liberals and MSM ate this speech up as genuine.Pure 100% posturing which the Clintons are known for. They'll take Obama's money to retire the debt then work to undermine him behind his back. It's amazing that so many Dems see no evil when it comes to the Clintons. They are devious people.

Posted by: Eusebius  
Jun 08, 02:00 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

Sooooo…. many words to say what, Dick?

That Hillary is an astute politician who is keeping her options open.

OMG! How insightful!

Then, as it is customary for you, you must make anything Hillary does sound sinister and malevolent. You say, “there is no benign explanation for her maneuvers.”

Dick, I’d say there is no benign explanation for your sick hatred for the Clintons. I’d recommend you enroll in an anger management program and get psychiatric treatment, including counseling and possibly medication.

Dick, get a life!

Posted by: hanksf  
Jun 08, 01:58 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

#93, your list pales in comparison with just one item - Rev. Wright. Good luck! Hillary was nice. The Republicans won't be.

Posted by: VOTE OBAMA  
Jun 08, 01:48 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

Obama will make a great President.

McCain is a corrupt flip-flopper. He has supported Congressional colleagues he knew were in ethical trouble(Rick Renzi, and many other Republicans). He has had no trouble discarding his "maverick reformer" principles when pandering for votes over the last two years. McCain has no principles left.

McCain dumped his first wife and, while still married to her, started dating a cheerleader/heiress who became the trophy wife who bankrolled his start in politics. Some values.

Obama is head and shoulders above McCain.

NO MCCAIN IN '08!
Vote for Obama

Posted by: ingram  
Jun 08, 01:32 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

To all Obama supporter
I am waiting to see Obama's contribution records and attendance records at Rev. Wright's church in the 20 years when Mr. Wright was his mentor. A wonderful speech by a great lady. She would have made a terrific President , if one had given her the opportunity. As of today I have left the Democratic Party and gone Independent. There was nothing democratic about this election process and I am utterly disgusted the way the DNC and leadership treated Clinton. Obama is an empty suit and with his thin resume and his rather questionable association with a radical church , plus the disgusting people he calls his friends and mentors , he should never be considered for the presidency. He severed his ties with them for political expedience and that makes him a real gutless weasel.
A wonderful speech by a great lady. She would have made a terrific President , if one had given her the opportunity. As of today I have left the Democratic Party and gone Independent. There was nothing democratic about this election process and I am utterly disgusted the way the DNC and leadership treated Clinton. Obama is an empty suit and with his thin resume and his rather questionable association with a radical church , plus the disgusting people he calls his friends and mentors , he should never be considered for the presidency. He severed his ties with them for political expedience and that makes him a real gutless weasel.

Posted by: briardeyesco  
Jun 08, 01:22 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

In 2012, it will be Hillary Clinton running against John McCain.

Posted by: David from Illinois  
Jun 08, 12:48 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

Many Hillary supporters will rally to Obama. Some will not. Both candidates had strengths & weaknesses. Obama has a light resume, with few really major legislative accomplishments. He has worked across the aisle at times, but in general has a very liberal voting record. He voted present in the Illinois General Assembly over 100 times. Republicans will highlight this. (I voted for Obama, btw, over the carpetbagger Alan Keyes, for Senator)

He has never held executive office. He came out of the Chicago & Cook County political world. He knocked a long time activist off the ballot by questioning her nominating petition signatures in his first race. He backed a handpicked Cook County Board President candidate (saying he thought Todd Stroger would be a reformer) & Stroger has raised sales taxes & decreased the service points for the health care system in Cook County, besides hiring friends, the connected & relatives. He has had ties to Tony Rezko - just indicted, Ayers, Rev. Wright, Father Pfleger & others for 20 years. Despite Obama's efforts of 20 years, South Chicago is no garden of Eden. Change is incremental and I fear expectations are far too high. I just wish he would acknowledge his past errors. I fear more controversial comments form Michelle Obama coming to light. I fear a lot of Obama supporters will be sorely disappointed by more scandals. I question if all his young supporters will turn out in November.

I will still consider Obama strongly in November, on policy issues & fear of more conservative federal court appointments by McCain, who is fairly conservative. But Obama's nomination troubles me a lot.

Posted by: Franklin T.  
Jun 08, 12:35 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

I could response to this article, but it would be a waste of time.

Posted by: GoldenChica  
Jun 08, 12:25 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

Dick I hear your door bell ringing Oh I see it is the paramedics coming to take you back to the psycho ward. They say this is the third time you have escaped from there.

Posted by: Nick L. from Kentucky  
Jun 08, 12:12 AM
Report Abuse
Reply

You and your right wing buddies are so pathetic and so very sad. Being unable to even say anything that resembles fair and balanced as it pertains to her concession speech is really very telling? You and your butt buddy Hannity's blatant hate of Hillary and inability to be honest about this speech today only makes me feel sorry for you and your kind. I pray for people like you and only hope that your poison is now seen for what it is...SICK and unworthy of even this reply. Why don't you just shut up and just go payoff one of your @#$%& to listen to this crap.

Posted by: celested9  
Jun 07, 11:29 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

Somebody needs to expose Dick Morris for the "dick" he is.

Everybody should know that his rabid hatred of the Clintons had it's genesis when Dick was fired because he let the prostitute he was with listen in on a conversation he was having with then President Bill Clinton.

Come on!! What could Bill do but fire him.

What was remarkable was that the Clintons didn't broadcast his atrocious behavior but kept his secret.

Then when Dick Morris started smearing Bill and Hillary, even Jim Lehrer asked President Clinton why he didn't let the press know why Morris was so angry and virulent.

Why Fox news and any other news outlet should want to hear from him has always been a puzzle to me.

Certainly, what he says is based on his anger and resentment and NOTHING else.

I remember him predicting Hillary's loss, in no uncertain terms, in her bid for the Senate. He is a joke and we should ignore the comments of this twisted, angry loser.

Posted by: Jim  
Jun 07, 10:31 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

Wow! When Dick Morris ever gets tired of trashing people who actually DO something with their lives, he can perform in nightclubs as a mind-reader. Or open up his own fortune-telling/tarot-card reading shop. I read minds, too. I would tell the world what Dick Morris REALLY thinks of his mother, but I'm not a little twit like he is.

Posted by: Vote McCain  
Jun 07, 10:06 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

Posted by: Not So Fast
Comment: #128

"the American body politic is a tender box right now."

You probably meant they're a "tinder box," but I think the American electorate are a bunch of @#$%&.

Posted by: Not So Fast  
Jun 07, 09:57 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

Oops. Freudian slip. "Tinder box" NOT "tender box" -- the Freudian slip is that the Bilderberg Group has "tender" feelings for the U.S., sort of their very own child which they prod and direct to mold the way they want. They also do this with Europe, but the U.S. -- being physically isolated from Europe -- is much easier to control.

And when I say that the U.S. is a "tinder box" right now -- well, that's exactly what I mean. We are very, very close to civil war in the U.S. If all it takes for Americans to scream for change is $4.00 a gallon gasoline, what in the world do you think is going to happen when gasoline is $7 a gallon, which it may well be by Christmas. We are on the verge of massive civil unrest, and the Bilderberg Group is trying in their own way -- as they have done for a long time -- to marshall that unrest for their own purposes (namely, the protection of the elite status quo).

Posted by: Clinton Supporter  
Jun 07, 09:57 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

You gotta be shitting me. Race-baiting is Obama politics 101. It is a sad day for America, if he gets elected.

RJII Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I hope this puts and end to all the race/gender,
> blue vs. white collar, etc. divisiveness.
>
> I pray Obama goes with his own choice for VP. I
> want to give him a real chance at changing the
> evil empire. He's going to need someone he trust
> and can blindly depend on. No Billary VPs.
>
> The focus now should be on Obama vs McSame.
> Either you're with us Dems or you ain't. It's
> your decision-- and I respect that. Now let's
> kick butt.

Posted by: jill1  
Jun 07, 09:56 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

Hey Dick,

What's in your pants?

Who's your copyeditor?

Posted by: Not So Fast  
Jun 07, 09:51 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

There's an easy explanation for Hillary Clinton's turnaround: The Bilderberg Group. That meeting that Clinton and Obama had at Feinstein's house was a farce; they really were meeting with The Bilderberg Group at the Marriott near the airport. Go to infowars.com for live video on this meeting.

I'm sure that James Johnson -- who is the "leader" of the VP Search Committee -- demanded that they attend a "come to Jesus" meeting -- where The Bilderberg Group demanded that the two put the squabbling aside and get down to business. Of course, most of this was aimed at Hillary Clinton since Obama has been following the script exactly. Does anyone really think that a bunch of representatives and Senators could force Clinton's hand? No, it took the power of the Bilderberg Group to put Hillary Clinton in her place. They probably told her that if she didn't start acting right, there wouldn't be any chance at at VP slot. Clinton's no fool -- she knows her best chance of becoming President is if she's the VP and Obama is assassinated. And there's ample evidence that Obama will be assassinated -- there are even Bible Codes predicting the assassination, but you don't need Bible Codes to know that Obama is making way too many changes for the old guard in Washington, especially those within the military industrial complex.

And the Bilderberg Group isn't a bunch of fools, either. They could see that Hillary Clinton was creating a perfect storm that was going to give the election to McCain -- and the Bilderberg Group knows that the US must have a Democratic President elected in 2008. They probably didn't care whether it was Clinton or Obama, but once it became evident that it was going to be Obama, then they moved swiftly to put Hillary Clinton in her place. Who knows what pressure they laid to bear: maybe threatening her political future, maybe threatening to release incriminating information about Bill Clinton's business dealings, probably both.

You see, the Bilderberg Group knows that the American body politic is a tender box right now. Americans' desire for change (so underestimated by the Clintons and the entire Democratic Party establishment) was made clear by the Obama campaign. And the Bilderberg Group understands that in order to prevent MASSIVE and REAL change in America, there have to be "orchestrated" changes in Washington -- kind of like a steam vent. And this means that McCain can't be elected because at least half of the American electorate would see this as a third Bush term and, as the economy continues to sink, would create an incredibly dangerous situation in America in terms of Americans' desire for change that could lead to a return to the civil unrest of the 1960's. And, in fact, if Obama is assassinated early in his administration, there may be such unrest -- but at least it can be explained. What can't be explained is the civil unrest of half of the country under a McCain administration. I think that's why McCain was allowed (and yes, I mean "allowed") to be Republican nominee: (a) it didn't matter who was the nominee, this election has to be won by a Democrat and (b) McCain doesn't plain by the rules, so setting him up for a real fall in the November election would diminish him and silence him forever.

So, you see, it was the Bilderberg Group that met with Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, and it was the Bilderberg Group that pulled rank on Clinton and got her to be so conciliatory today. Her desire for "unity" had nothing to do with it. That much was clear from her body language and her tone of voice, where she smiled and was emphatic when speaking of her own campaign and her own supporters, and where she was grim and not-quite-as-enthusiastic-as-she-could-be when she was talking about Obama.

Posted by: Genevieve  
Jun 07, 09:46 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

It's nice to see you know nothing about the electoral college or which states are, in fact, "the most red." You don't even know how to read polls. Oh, and the Bradley effect was brought up by Eugene Robinson to call NH a racist state. Apparently, there will be a lot of racist states swinging red in November. It will spare us another disastrous Carter presidency.

JWilson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Obama's people labelled most of West Virginia
> racists. Good luck going back there to win in
> November. "
>
> Yes.. because lord knows when polls show that 22%
> of voters based on race, and with the Bradley
> effect consideration - racism, in fact, WAS the
> point of difference.
>
> And... are you aware of any Dem candidates who
> were considering going to West Virginia for the
> general? Do you really believe they were going to
> take money from OH, PA, FL, MO, IA, CO, IN - in
> order to "go back there and win" in one of the
> most Republcian states in the union?
>
> Oye.

Posted by: Genevieve  
Jun 07, 09:33 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

If the Democrats were gullible enough to fall for Karl Rove's divide and conquer strategies, then they are unfit to rule this country through having a majority of Congress, appointing justices and controlling the executive branch of government. Can you imagine the chaos? Democratic party leaders were complicit in this strategy for their own selfish reasons (money and votes - politics.) Obama is arrogant enough to buy his own hype. He participated in this sham of democracy for his own reasons, maybe he actually believes he can win. However, being a puppet of the Republicans does not make him an effective leader, and the presidency is not just some door prize for a political party.

OregonVoter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In November, if I vote for Barack Obama, it is not
> because I believe in his message, it will be because I have
> a thoery that when Barack Obama took the national stage at the
> DNC convention in 2004, that Karl Rove and company took notice
> and began a quest to divide and conquer the Democratic Party,
> influencing the 2004 Illinois senate race in having Alan
> Keyes, an arch conservative african-american from Maryland,
> running against Obama to ensure his victory and thus his ascension
> into the open arms of the Democratic establishment.
>
> They had to have known about his controversial
> connections in 06, and they
> know that they just need to infleunce a few
> thousand swing voters in
> just a few states to ensure a republican victory
> in Nov. IF they could help Obama
> win the nomination, they would rid themselves of
> the real threat another
> Clinton administration would be to them. And
> divide the democratic party.
>
> Even at this moment, the Hillary bashing, the
> Obama bashing continues.
> Democrats........ we need a miracle to win!!!!!

Posted by: Sue H  
Jun 07, 09:04 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

Well at least you were named right DICK

Posted by: UpperMich  
Jun 07, 08:52 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

hugh graham Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Audacity of Hype Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > HRC suffered far worse abuse for being a woman
> > than O ever did for being black.
>
>
> Perhaps, but she has never been at much risk of
> being shot for being a woman

There is also the historically rooted stigma in this country of a black man attacking a white woman and what happens to him if he does.

Posted by: Genevieve  
Jun 07, 08:52 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

[www.youtube.com]

Sharpton Keepin it Real Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sylvia Jackson wrote:
>
> "Obama behaved badly in this campaign, he
> disrespected Hillary"
>
> Save it Sylvia Jackson, we know you are a
> Republican troll trying to spread discord, no one
> believes that Barack mistreated Hillary during the
> campaign, if anything he treated her with kid
> gloves, knowing that as a relatively young Black
> man or a man period - he could not be seen
> mistreating the elderly ex-first lady - so save
> that crap.

Posted by: hugh graham  
Jun 07, 08:47 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

Audacity of Hype Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HRC suffered far worse abuse for being a woman
> than O ever did for being black.


Perhaps, but she has never been at much risk of being shot for being a woman

Posted by: hugh graham  
Jun 07, 08:44 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

Dick, "Popeye the Sailor Man", Morris?

Why are this guy's opinions getting published?

Posted by: christine Lewis  
Jun 07, 08:35 PM
Report Abuse
Reply

Don'tScaremewithRoe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am still voting for McCain.
>
> Roe vs. Wade scare is silly. Even if it is
> abolished, you still will be able to get an
> abortion at another state, since it will be left
> to the states. I actually think it may be better
> because we would stop discussing it, some state
> want it, some don't. I also don't think they will
> actually abolish is simply because men would have
> to be paying child support for kids they wouldn't
> want to have, so I am pretty sure men would not go
> for it. I am raging feminist in my early 30's
> PhD, East Coast latte liberal, but I think that 4
> years of McCain are worth another shot for Clinton
> in 2012. Otherwise we will never have woman as
> president in our lifetime. I rather have 4 years
> of McCain, then 8 years of Clinton, rather than, 4
> years of Obama, then 8 years of Romney and 8 years
> of Jeb Bush. Sorry....

** I couldn't agree more with this post. Roe V Wade will not 'scare' us into voting for Obama. I am a woman who had an abortion, and doing so has nearly ruined my life. I am a Democratic woman, I don't believe in abortion, and I don't believe in Obama.

Posted by: JWils